Angela Provitera McGlynn is Professor Emeritus from Mercer County
Community College in New Jersey. Angela taught for over 35 years
and has a passion for students and for quality learning
experiences. Since retiring from the classroom, she has spent
considerable time working with faculties on teaching improvement.
She's also been busy writing and doing other consulting projects.
Angela is the author of the popular
Successful
Beginnings for College Teaching: Engaging Your Students from the
First Day
and her new title,
Teaching
Today's College Students: Widening the Circle of Success.
QUESTIONS:
~In
your new book,
Teaching Today's College Students, you talk about the changing student demographics on
college campuses. As we read the current literature, we can't help
but notice that many writers and educators wring their hands and
lament about today's students—particularly the Millennials. You
don't seem to take that view. Would you talk about that?
First let me say
that I can empathize with the frustrations of those teachers who
are trying to reach the “millennials” every day in their classes.
It was only when I started to understand who these students are
and how their life experiences shaped their attitudes and behavior
that I was able to see them in a new light and change my
approaches in dealing with them.
Although colleges
are now hiring younger teachers as the baby-boomers retire, our
nation’s colleges and universities are still largely made up of
baby-boomer professors. While age diversity is apparent among the
student population, particularly at the community college sector,
the largest age-group of students are the millennials because of
the demographic groundswell of these traditional college-age
students.
So the challenge
becomes, “How do we narrow both the cultural gap and the digital
gap between the baby-boomer teachers and the millennial students?”
The cultural divide involves different attitudes toward studying
and work. Rather than knocking our “teacher-heads” against the
wall to mold students into what we were like as students, we need
to learn how to engage them with the course material, how to
motivate them to succeed academically, and how to foster critical
thinking skills. I am not advocating the notion that we abdicate
helping our students to assimilate into the world of academia but
we need to first reach them where they are.
Millennials have
been referred to as “digital natives” since they came into the
world “wired” and now many are even “wireless.” They see the rest
of us as “immigrants’ to the world of technology and often
disparage our lack of technological savvy. Today’s faculty ought
to be open to training in technology so that they can incorporate
the best that technology has to offer into their courses. That may
include having course syllabi and materials on a faculty Web page.
It might include Power Point presentations or being able to bring
video clips from the Internet into the classroom or even being
able to master the “smart board.” So many things are possible,
including hybrid courses that involve both the classroom and an
online component. However, in my opinion, it is still possible for
a college teacher to be effective in the classroom without using
technology. The “old-fashioned” lecture/discussion can be
engaging, interactive, and very productive. As long as we don’t
lose sight of the fact that technology is their world and we
become more accepting of this fact, I think we will be able to
relate to this “Net Gen”—as millennials have also been called.
~Today's
classrooms have various generations in one class. Is this a unique
difficulty in course planning at this point in time?
It is true that
there is a mix of generations in our college classrooms; this is
particularly true for the community college sector. I have had
students in the same classroom ranging in ages from the
traditional 18 to 22 year-olds through several decades including
students in their 80s. This requires some ingenuity on the part of
the teacher so that everyone feels included. The teacher who has a
wide repertoire of pedagogical strategies to employ has an
advantage. Teachers need to be aware of the references they make
in class, sometimes noting the time frame, bringing younger
students up to speed in terms of historical references and having
younger students explain their worlds to older students. Doing
collaborative learning in small groups works best with
heterogeneous groupings in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, and
age. I have found multi-generational classes to be challenging,
yet at the same time, they are rich in opportunities for learning
from one another. In my experience, older students in class always
enrich the class discussion since they have so much life
experience to draw from.
~In both of
your books you emphasize building a welcoming and inclusive
community in the classroom, which I'm sure most teachers would
love to have. However, with demands for covering set material so
common today, can't community building take time away from
teaching content?
Covering the
course syllabus was always one of my paramount objectives,
particularly in my early years of teaching. I was always feeling
“behind” as I tried to cover all the material. And, as I learned
more about the nuances of all the topics I was covering in
psychology and all the changes in my discipline, I tried to “talk
faster.”
It was through
some readings I did by other educators confronting the same
dilemma that I opened up to the idea that “covering” the material
was not nearly as important as having students “uncover” the
material. I could get through the syllabus, but were my students
learning all that I was teaching? Was lecturing “at” my students
the best way for them to grasp the material and even more
importantly, retain it? Given the “shelf-life” of the content, was
it more important for me to teach my students how to learn, how to
find material, how to discern whether the source of the material
was credible, and how to communicate both orally and in writing
what they were discovering?
I suppose all the
evidence about the importance of active learning and the
development of critical thinking skills started to sink in and
influence my attitude towards “imparting knowledge.” That old
phrase sticks with me—is the most effective teacher the “sage on
the stage” or the “guide on the side?”
~In recent
years there has been a growth in teaching enhancement centers in
all types of higher education—and seemingly much enthusiasm for
this movement. What have you seen as the result of these efforts?
I believe that
the development of Centers for Learning and Teaching (CELT) and
Centers for Excellence in Teaching and Learning are greatly
contributing to the dialogue on learning and effective teaching.
Usually, these centers are headed by the most dedicated and
enthusiastic teachers and every institution needs leaders like
these to create grass-roots movements on college campuses that
keep the discussion alive and thriving. These centers are often
the sources of much of the professional development that takes
place and they have the potential to revitalize faculties by what
I see as a “ripple effect.” A core of teachers usually gets
involved and then their enthusiasm spreads among their colleagues.
These centers often promote evidence-based decision making in
terms of what promotes student success. Of course, student success
should be the number one goal of every institution of higher
education.
~Finally,
what sort of advice would you give new faculty members about their
chosen profession?
The first thing I
would say is that teaching is an art form. What I mean by this is
similar to what Erich Fromm said about love in his famous book,
The Art of Loving. One of the take-home messages of that book
is that to become a loving person takes a great deal of practice
and development. Similarly, I believe that our task as teachers is
to strive towards mastering the art of teaching, recognizing that
as we develop, we will never reach our destiny. Mastering the art
of teaching requires being open to an on-going journey.
Secondly, I would
tell new faculty members that they are embarking on a journey that
has the potential to change people’s lives positively and
profoundly. Thirdly, I would remind them of Maya Angelou’s words
because to me they speak to the “affective” dimension of teaching.
In order for students to learn in our classes, they need to feel
safe, welcome, and included. Angelou said, “People will forget
what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will
never forget how you made them feel.”
~Thank you,
Angela, for sharing with
us. If anyone has particular questions for Angela, please send them
to
customerservice@atwoodpublishing.com and we will forward them
to her.
|